Cons of Bundling Rule

September 09, 2010, 10:31:02 AM

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

News: This Forum was initiated by RSN/weKAN to foster informed discussion on the Proposed Rule for a Prospective Payment System under the CMS ESRD Program for kidney dialysis. The comment period for this closed on December 16, 2009, and we are awaiting CMS' response to all the filed public comments.

We will now use the forum to focus on all aspects of renal advocacy issues. Please use this forum to ask questions and share perspectives and concerns; just click on the links below to learn about a topic. Everyone has read privileges immediately, but if you want to participate, post comments or ask questions you need to register, wait for approval and then log in.

This forum is brought to you by RSNhope.org.

Subject	Started by	Replies	Views	Last post
Beneficiary to pay 20% of ESRD Payment	Hartwell	9	1079	December 02, 2009, 10:22:43 PM by Bill Peckham
Training for home dialysis is not billed seperately.	Hartwell	2	619	October 25, 2009, 07:05:18 PM by Denise
Patient co-pays are higher	Hartwell	3	464	October 22, 2009, 04:12:50 PM by Roberta Mikles
Comments of Cons on Bundling	Hartwell	8	673	October 22, 2009, 04:10:25 PM by Roberta Mikles
Cut to 98% Rate to Meet Budget Neutrality Requirements	Hartwell	0	327	September 21, 2009, 03:39:21 PM by Hartwell

Topic you have posted in

Normal Topic

Hot Topic (More than 15 replies)

Very Hot Topic (More than 25 replies)

Locked Topic

Sticky Topic

Poll

Jump to: